Here are a couple videos of stingrays. That’s right… stingrays. The baby stingrays in this first video have translucent skin which allows you to partially see the internal organs and features of this species of stingrays. The first 30 seconds are ho-hum. A couple of stingrays skimming the bottom of the tank. But wait until the 30 second mark – when the first of the two start swimming up and you have a clear view of the underbelly.
Look familiar? Just watch them dance.
Dancing baby stingray
Maybe you have seen this before, but I most certainly have not – and I find it utterly amazing! In the middle of the body are what appears to be it’s organs. But the very outer edge of it’s organs on both sides looks like it has two leg-like appendages, but have not evolved away as of yet.
Then I may be completely off base and those are not legs – or arms – but are some type of appendage, anyway. Regardless, this species of stingray, which I am unable to find more information, has two “legs” that I was completely unaware of. Then you add in the eyes and mouth, and it almost looks as though it is some sort of amphibian-humanoid which may have been the early creatures which eventually left the ocean for land.
.
Stingray Gives Birth On Land After Being Caught By Fisherman
In this next video, you will actually watch a stingray give birth. But I will forewarn you – you may find the scenario offensive. But think about this logically. A man was fishing off his pier and caught a stingray. If you have ever been salt-water or deep-water fishing, it happens. There are also fresh-water stingrays, but salt-water is much more commonly caught. I have caught one myself when I was young and fishing with my father off of a pier in Florida. We cut the line and put it back in the water and off it went.
I imagine that was the plan of this man – then suddenly, he realized the stingray was giving birth! My initial reaction was not unlike many other reactions and comments on this video… when the guy saw it was giving birth, why didn’t he immediately put her back in the water? Then I really started to think about it. Would I have immediately thrown it back in? Or would I continue completely fascinated by watching the birth. To be perfectly honest… I would have continued filming, too. Although I wouldn’t have waited as long as this dude did to put them back in the water. This would be a once-in-a-lifetime event to witness – and by pure happenstance.
If you do not want to watch the entire video, as it gets very boring as he sets the camera down. But he does eventually return them all, mother and babies, back to the water. When watching, remember that those two protrusions on either side of the tail are the leg-like appendages. Then when giving birth – remarkably resembles a woman giving birth.
.
Am I trying to say that we evolved from the stingray? Absolutely not. Look at the evolutionary value here. Many types of sea life have developed appendages to help them survive – as life truly is “survival of the fittest.” But when I saw these legs, my jaw dropped. We are all tied together by continuing backwards in time – reversing the evolutionary timeline until we return to the point where sea creatures, for whatever survival reason, crawled out of the water and survived.
Then they eventually walked.
.
.
.
.
.
And eventually danced (someone’s Photoshop joke of the dancing baby stingray):
Related Articles:
Wikipedia: Stingray
Stingrays: Florida sting rays
Categories: All, She speaks..., Variety & Odd News, Wildlife
They also taste a lot like scallops.
Part of the problem of growing up subsistence fishing, I guess.
mmmmm… scallops! Love ’em! So that was a lot of source of food for you and your family? Fishing?
Most of what we ate. Which is OK – except it can get boring after 2 months of 1 kind of fish.
My mom even experimented with making pickled bluefish.
Ewww… I don’t care for pickled anything. Well, I take that back. In Kentucky at the Red River Gorge where I used to go rock climbing, there was this little store that sold pickles bologna. I did like that!
This does not define evolution! This simply shows the growth of a stin ray! Evolution is wrong and has been proven to be practically false!
It is an example, not a definition, of an animal who may have had two “legs” or some sort of leg-like appendages. But, though time and for various reason, the appendages shrunk to what they are now. Which also helped the ray survive for millions of years. With evolution, you have to think about the entire span of the time on earth. Not just in your lifespan.
Thank you for the share. Very cool..
Remember going fishing, and caught a shark ( actually it ate the rock cod I caught) that after being hauled on board suddenly dropped around 20 little sharks on the deck.
Oh, my! That had to have been a sight!
not legs, but modified pelvic fins that they use for mating when grown up.
They aren’t legs. They are modified pelvic fins called claspers, which adult rays use to mate. 😉
I didn’t say they were legs, just that they looked like it. My point is about evolution. How some prehistoric creature like this was the precursor to man, just look at the similarity of body parts or placement.
This is not evolution! God created them this way. They are not legs nor were they ever legs! They are used for reproductive purposes when they mature.
Ummm… nope.
what if, a million years ago stingrays became rats
Those aren’t legs 🙂 they are pelvic fins
I didn’t say they were. My point is they may have eventually evolved into legs. Or had legs and lost them with evolution.
You are right. The evolution of hind legs began as enhanced pelvic fins as can been seen in the Tiktaalik.
Thank you!
Those aren’t eyes btw, those are nostrils.
wow! u go ray! continue…
Ok sorry to burst a bubble but it’s just a normal baby sting ray that you can see it’s organs, not an evolving creature. Those ‘legs’ are present in all rays which are reproductive organs.
They’re claspers used for mating.. not fins or legs
Yeah, I probably shouldn’t have used the word “legs.” Appendages is probably a better description. But at some point-in-time, they may have evolved into legs in order to walk on land.
If evolution is true, why do the apes still exist, since they supposedly evolved into man? And why is it still called a theory- someone’s (Darwin’s) suggestion that has not been proven by the scientific process?
Evolution is an adaptation to one’s environment. I imagine there were some apes whose environment was not one that needed any evolutionary changes. And Darwin’s Theory of Evolution is still deemed a theory because, in order for it to move to a “fact” state, the theory must be observed in the “now.” Well, since evolution takes thousands of years to occur in any given species, that’s pretty hard to witness. Given today’s technology, I suppose it’s possible to track a species changes through the years but the species selected be going through evolutionary changes? Cockroaches have remained unchanged for billions of years because, well, they got it right. Damn critters can live through anything. Why change something good?
Our rocks layers and fossils do provide evidence of evolution. Why some species simply died off and others’ evolved we may never know. But most species do evolve, if even so slightly, over the years. Think of evolution as adapting to one’s environment. We have a lot of evidence to support evolution, but none to support divine creation. A book of stories is not evidence.