FBI’s most wanted poster of Osama Bin Laden makes no mention of 911… why not?
Now, for the flip side of my previous post asking FOX to put a lid on it out of respect to the families of the 911 victims….
I most certainly believe in free-thinking… to explore, gather data, and come to my own conclusions. However, when the facts and truths are limited or skewed, I often find myself not being able to being able to reasonably come to a decision. Therefore, I remain agnostic on the matter… neither believing nor disbelieving what has been laid before me.
I have now come to realize I am in a quandry with 911…. First of all, I most certainly believe without a doubt that the general public, such as myself, will never know the true facts behind the collapse of the Twin Towers and Building 7. Was it Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda fronting an act of terrorism against the “infedel” know as the US? Was it perhaps Bush and part of the US government (or US-International combination) seeking to obtain world-wide power and financial gain? Or another inexplicable reason altogether? The truths behind this day will never be known beyond a doubt. The families of the innocent will forever suffer. Since the day I watched the towers collapse, it has never set right with me that they went down in a manner much like implosion. And then there’s Building 7….
When I was prepping my previous posting which is asking FOX to shut the #*@! up and stop whining on how Obama sent the Seals in to capture/kill Bin Laden (out of respect for the 911 families), I wanted to include an image of the “FBI Most Wanted” poster of Osama Bin Laden. So I googled away… but what I found surprised me.
No where on this wanted poster does it mention 911…. no where.
.
____________________________________________________
It states, “Usama Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998, bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. These attacks killed over 200 people. In addition, Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world.”
Nothing… nada… zero… zilch.
For nearly ten years, we have been led to believe that Bin Laden was behind this horrific event. Have we been lied to this whole time? Placing blame on OBL for ulterior motives?
I’m tired of excuses and lies. What is the truth?
.
I am neither affirming nor denying this viewpoint of what occurred on 9/11/2001. Just passing on information for you to decide….
.
.
Top Posts
This problem can be solved by pre-school children in 5-10 minutes. By programmers in one hour.
Click on image to go to full problem
Motley News, Photos and Fun 
An old poster? A case of accidental honesty? Who knows?
Somebody knows… but not us.
I can not be aware that people today in Europe, the wiping out of bin Laden thought to be critical. You can find critique that bin Laden received no trial and that the U.S. invaded a foreign place. I think the U.S. had every right to perform this procedure. Who, if not the U.S.? I’m from Germany I am so joyful as the Americans about this campaign. Congratulations!
It’s been asked of the FBI in 2006 and their reply was that there was no concrete evidence linking him to the event. That’s the short story. In regards to your 9/11 stance, the Bush administration of the perpetration is very farfetched. More likely you’d be looking at CIA/Mossad influence to inspire the event and make sure it happens as well as plant the necessary items in the buildings to take them down. It’s a tough thing to perpetrate and conceal, but I don’t think it’s impossible. The groups that benefited most from 9/11 were the international bankers/IMF as well as Israel which leads me down that path. These wars almost insure that we’ll need an IMF bailout that many European countries have been getting…
Good job thinking and being skeptical. Even if wrong, the ideas make it harder for those with enormous power interests to do their deeds.
Personally, I don’t think it’s Bush. He was nothing but a pawn. If there is more to 911 than what we’ve been led to believe, it is from those who have much more power than Bush had.
It was actually the Clinton administration who issued the order. This conservative visited the Clinton library yesterday and there is an Usamo Bin Laden wanted poster hanging there.
There was never sufficient evidence to link bin Laden to 9/11, although it is reported that he approved of it.
America missed out on a golden opportunity (did they really?) to parade Bin Laden to the world when he was allegedly assassinated. According to the news, he was shot without having a chance to surrender.
Then one would think that his body would have been able to be kept in a freezer/preserved until arriving in America where he could be scrutinized and photographed by the Press as evidence that the “greatest terrorist” of the 21st century had been found and neutralized.
Instead, Bin Laden is “buried at sea” and all we the People have is yet another story without any evidence along with the alleged identities of the 9-11 19, 4 of whom were no more than light aircraft pilots with some training on unrelated simulators to the aircraft types they were alleged to have flown that day for the very first time, and who were never identified by DNA.
By the way, the FBI file of Bin Laden presented above was genuine, easily pulled up via a link which now leads to a general site on the FBI.
I hadn’t inspected the link for years, but I believe it was changed around 2015, give or take a year or so.
Two other links to records that have been changed around the same time. The FBI file on the “ID” of the alleged 19 hijackers, that clearly stated that they were believed (or thought) to be the perpetrators.
Those names were released to the howling media who took them to be genuine, and those names now reside in history as the perpetrators of the 9-11 flights, despite they never having been formally and scientifically (DNA) identified.
Via the changing story of the alleged list of hijackers “found in Atta’s luggage”, where at least four of the names were changed later, any list of passengers travelling on those flights that is presented as evidence, has been changed.
The BTS page on American Airlines departures from Dulles on 9-11 which showed for at least 14 years Flight 77 to be scheduled BUT NOT DEPARTING that day.
The file now shows no mention of Flight 77 at all.
Flight 77 was a routine scheduled flight to LA departing from Dulles at 0810 every morning (at least during the week).
A US govt agency statistical record has been altered.
Regarding the video. There are many professionals who have risked their reputations by simply demanding that another enquiry that permits solid evidence to be presented be held, including Air Transport pilots, trained to the highest level possible of airmanship, and who also have put their reputations on the line because their experience and training tell them that there are definite anomalies in the US Govt Official Story, some of them easily perceived even by lay people who read Chapter 7 of the 9-11 Commission Report with an open mind.
My view is that examination of the flights themselves, particularly the alleged Flight 77, will reveal the US govt official story to be seriously flawed in so many ways, that it simply cannot be taken as factual.